🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."