🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about business sector influence with public health regulations. Last month, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, BAT suggests this be lowered to 30% or 50% “following international suggested parameters”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for multiple violations “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Company justification

In the letter, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “supports the objectives of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its operations according with applicable local laws. Moreover, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, noting that underage people should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion developing rules to accomplish desired population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.